India’s defense expenditure has grown steadily in line with its global ambitions. With rising regional threats, border tensions, and the need to modernize a vast military, the allocation of resources isn’t the problem.

The real question is: Why hasn’t this spending created an indigenous arsenal?

🧾 The Budget Looks Strong on Paper…

The 2025–26 Indian defense budget includes:

• ₹1.72 lakh crore for capital acquisition (modernization)

• ₹4.39 lakh crore for defense services (operational expenses)

• ₹1.32 lakh crore for pensions

• ₹1.68 lakh crore earmarked for procurement under the “Make in India” push

Yet despite these figures, the bulk of big-ticket purchases continue to be foreign-origin.

Recent or ongoing imports include:

• Rafale fighters (France)

• S-400 air defense systems (Russia)

• GE F414 jet engines (USA)

• Heron UAVs (Israel)

• Apache & Chinook helicopters (USA)

• Assault rifles (AK-203 from Russia, SIG716 from USA)

🛑 The Indigenous Arsenal That Never Was

India has tried developing several indigenous platforms — Arjun tanks, Tejas jets, NAG missiles, INSAS rifles — but few have seen full-scale induction or export success.

Why?

Because:

• Many homegrown projects face delays, cost overruns, or lack user satisfaction

• Private Indian firms are sidelined in favor of DPSUs

• Imported systems are often preferred for their proven battlefield performance

This leads to a tragic loop:
➡ We spend heavily on imports
➡ Local innovation is underfunded
➡ Private players get discouraged
➡ Indigenous capability never matures

💰 Spending Without Sovereignty

While the “Atmanirbhar Bharat” initiative is a step forward, the results have yet to show at scale.
India remains the world’s largest arms importer, accounting for roughly 11% of global imports between 2018–2023.

That means:

• Billions of dollars flow out of India every year

• Local supply chains remain underdeveloped

• IP ownership stays abroad, limiting strategic independence

🧠 Building an Indigenous Arsenal: The Missed Opportunity

Defense is not just about weapons — it’s about ecosystems:

• Secure electronics

• Modular components

• Precision engineering

• AI-powered battlefield software

• Ammo and logistics automation

• Combat optics, sensors, and comms

If India had invested even 50% of its capital expenditure into building these ecosystems over the last two decades, we’d have become a net exporter by now.

Instead, we’re spending to operate other countries’ technologies.

🔧 How to Fix It: Don’t Just Buy — Build

To turn this around, India must:

• Mandate indigenous platforms in at least 50% of large capital buys

• Open up procurement to tier-2 and tier-3 startups, not just big DPSUs

• Offer tax + infra incentives for local defense component manufacturing

• Establish a Defense Sovereignty Fund to back IP-first projects

It’s time to stop equating spending with strength. True military strength is built, not bought.

India can’t afford to remain a top spender without becoming a top builder.